+1,022.8%
NBIS vs AEHR
+508.2%
+514.6%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AEHR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | +0.9% | -2.5% | -1.9% |
| 7D | -0.8% | +9.8% | -10.6% | -4.4% |
| 30D | -13.4% | -26.7% | +13.4% | -2.9% |
| 3M | +1.0% | -8.1% | +9.1% | +2.5% |
| 6M | +100.5% | +123.1% | -22.6% | +42.5% |
| YTD | +168.3% | +369.0% | -200.7% | +41.2% |
| 1Y | +151.8% | +256.4% | -104.6% | +41.8% |
| All | +1,022.8% | +508.2% | +514.6% | +312.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AEHR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AEHR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AEHR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AEHR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling