+1,101.8%
NBIS vs ACGL
-6.9%
+1,108.6%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 10y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | +0.4% | -1.9% | -1.0% |
| 7D | +17.8% | -2.1% | +19.9% | +15.6% |
| 30D | +30.5% | -2.2% | +32.7% | +28.6% |
| 3M | +9.2% | +6.3% | +2.9% | +16.4% |
| 6M | +153.2% | +0.5% | +152.6% | +163.9% |
| YTD | +187.1% | +0.2% | +186.9% | +201.1% |
| 1Y | +151.1% | +7.3% | +143.8% | +170.8% |
| All | +1,101.8% | -6.9% | +1,108.6% | +1,184.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 10y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
10y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling