+128.2%
NAMS vs VOO
+77.4%
+50.8%
-47.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.3% | +0.8% | +3.5% | +3.3% |
| 7D | -10.2% | -0.8% | -9.5% | -9.4% |
| 30D | -18.1% | -1.1% | -17.0% | -17.0% |
| 3M | -24.7% | +3.9% | -28.5% | -27.9% |
| 6M | -27.3% | +13.6% | -40.9% | -37.0% |
| YTD | -35.0% | +12.7% | -47.7% | -43.3% |
| 1Y | -14.3% | +17.6% | -31.9% | -28.7% |
| 3Y | +128.2% | +77.3% | +50.9% | -11.5% |
| All | +128.2% | +77.4% | +50.8% | -11.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling