+313.6%
MXL vs LSCC
+77.7%
+235.8%
-55.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LSCC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.0% | +1.4% | +4.6% | +4.6% |
| 7D | +15.5% | +5.2% | +10.3% | +9.7% |
| 30D | -11.3% | -9.6% | -1.7% | -0.4% |
| 3M | -16.1% | -17.8% | +1.7% | +9.1% |
| 6M | +323.0% | +37.4% | +285.6% | +285.1% |
| YTD | +281.5% | +59.7% | +221.8% | +200.7% |
| All | +313.6% | +77.7% | +235.8% | +202.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LSCC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LSCC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LSCC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LSCC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling