+348.6%
MXL vs FCUV
-68.1%
+416.7%
-55.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | FCUV | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.5% | -7.0% | +14.6% | +7.4% |
| 7D | +19.0% | -63.8% | +82.7% | +18.1% |
| 30D | +4.5% | -14.7% | +19.2% | +5.1% |
| 3M | -1.5% | +65.3% | -66.8% | +3.0% |
| 6M | +348.6% | -68.5% | +417.1% | +350.0% |
| All | +348.6% | -68.1% | +416.7% | +350.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FCUV.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FCUV return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FCUV return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FCUV wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling