+341.2%
MXL vs EQH
+38.6%
+302.6%
-55.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | EQH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.5% | +1.4% | +6.1% | +8.0% |
| 7D | +18.9% | +0.7% | +18.1% | +19.2% |
| 30D | +0.3% | +2.8% | -2.5% | +0.9% |
| 3M | -8.0% | +23.1% | -31.1% | +0.7% |
| 6M | +341.2% | +41.4% | +299.8% | +384.9% |
| All | +341.2% | +38.6% | +302.6% | +384.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EQH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EQH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EQH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EQH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling