+215.7%
MXL vs ABCL
+103.9%
+111.8%
-63.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.5% | -3.4% | +10.9% | +8.4% |
| 7D | +19.0% | -2.7% | +21.7% | +19.7% |
| 30D | +4.5% | +18.3% | -13.8% | -0.3% |
| 3M | -1.5% | +108.5% | -110.0% | -21.1% |
| 6M | +348.6% | +213.9% | +134.7% | +220.7% |
| YTD | +310.3% | +223.1% | +87.2% | +186.7% |
| 1Y | +344.7% | +160.6% | +184.1% | +225.5% |
| All | +215.7% | +103.9% | +111.8% | +112.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling