+27.0%
MUZ vs ARMK
-10.5%
+37.5%
-47.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +33.9% | -3.9% | +37.8% | +28.5% |
| 7D | +79.0% | -10.2% | +89.2% | +63.1% |
| 30D | +104.4% | -9.3% | +113.7% | +89.2% |
| 3M | +27.0% | -11.4% | +38.4% | +18.1% |
| All | +27.0% | -10.5% | +37.5% | +18.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling