+2,538.2%
MUU vs ZCMD
-99.9%
+2,638.2%
-75.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.0% | -0.5% | -2.5% | -3.0% |
| 7D | +13.9% | -1.4% | +15.3% | +13.9% |
| 30D | +24.8% | -21.6% | +46.4% | +25.1% |
| 3M | -15.7% | -67.4% | +51.6% | -15.6% |
| 6M | +338.9% | -99.4% | +438.3% | +298.8% |
| YTD | +563.2% | -99.7% | +662.9% | +503.1% |
| 1Y | +2,577.5% | -99.9% | +2,677.4% | +2,327.5% |
| All | +2,538.2% | -99.9% | +2,638.2% | +2,140.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling