+2,620.0%
MUU vs NTAP
+51.7%
+2,568.3%
-75.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NTAP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +11.6% | +0.1% | +11.5% | +11.5% |
| 7D | +17.4% | -0.8% | +18.1% | +18.4% |
| 30D | +24.0% | -0.5% | +24.5% | +23.4% |
| 3M | -23.9% | +4.1% | -28.0% | -26.6% |
| 6M | +284.4% | +88.0% | +196.5% | +47.4% |
| YTD | +583.7% | +75.6% | +508.1% | +176.4% |
| 1Y | +2,981.5% | +58.9% | +2,922.6% | +1,462.2% |
| All | +2,620.0% | +51.7% | +2,568.3% | +1,214.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTAP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTAP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTAP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTAP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling