+2,538.2%
MUU vs LNT
+22.5%
+2,515.7%
-75.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.0% | +0.9% | -3.9% | -2.4% |
| 7D | +13.9% | +1.0% | +12.9% | +14.6% |
| 30D | +24.8% | -1.1% | +25.9% | +23.9% |
| 3M | -15.7% | -3.6% | -12.1% | -17.1% |
| 6M | +338.9% | -2.7% | +341.5% | +335.9% |
| YTD | +563.2% | +8.0% | +555.1% | +565.5% |
| 1Y | +2,577.5% | +10.5% | +2,567.0% | +2,568.9% |
| All | +2,538.2% | +22.5% | +2,515.7% | +2,738.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling