+908.0%
MUU vs LDOS
-17.1%
+925.1%
-79.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -34.4% | +0.1% | -34.5% | -34.4% |
| 7D | -53.2% | -3.7% | -49.5% | -53.3% |
| 30D | -64.1% | +16.4% | -80.5% | -64.0% |
| 3M | -54.1% | +7.4% | -61.5% | -54.1% |
| 6M | -37.7% | -0.3% | -37.3% | -33.3% |
| YTD | +153.4% | -24.0% | +177.4% | +197.2% |
| 1Y | +237.5% | -29.6% | +267.0% | +324.3% |
| All | +908.0% | -17.1% | +925.1% | +801.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling