+908.0%
MUU vs GLDM
+56.3%
+851.7%
-79.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -34.4% | +0.8% | -35.2% | -35.4% |
| 7D | -53.2% | +1.9% | -55.1% | -54.8% |
| 30D | -64.1% | -1.7% | -62.4% | -63.6% |
| 3M | -54.1% | -3.5% | -50.5% | -52.2% |
| 6M | -37.7% | -10.1% | -27.6% | -28.7% |
| YTD | +153.4% | -5.0% | +158.4% | +189.9% |
| 1Y | +237.5% | +2.8% | +234.7% | +261.3% |
| All | +908.0% | +56.3% | +851.7% | +544.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling