+311.9%
MULL vs TXG
+228.4%
+83.5%
-68.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | TXG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.4% | +2.6% | +2.8% | +3.8% |
| 7D | +14.8% | +9.1% | +5.6% | +8.3% |
| 30D | +36.6% | +14.9% | +21.7% | +24.6% |
| 3M | -8.9% | +120.0% | -128.9% | -42.1% |
| 6M | +311.9% | +221.8% | +90.1% | +152.1% |
| All | +311.9% | +228.4% | +83.5% | +152.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TXG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TXG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TXG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TXG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling