+311.9%
MULL vs NVMI
-7.8%
+319.7%
-68.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NVMI | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.4% | -0.9% | +6.3% | +7.1% |
| 7D | +14.8% | +6.9% | +7.8% | +0.4% |
| 30D | +36.6% | -2.8% | +39.4% | +45.7% |
| 3M | -8.9% | -27.3% | +18.5% | +103.0% |
| 6M | +311.9% | -13.7% | +325.6% | +569.6% |
| All | +311.9% | -7.8% | +319.7% | +569.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NVMI.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NVMI return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NVMI return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NVMI wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling