+311.9%
MULL vs NTR
+6.5%
+305.4%
-68.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NTR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.4% | 0.0% | +5.4% | +5.4% |
| 7D | +14.8% | +0.5% | +14.2% | +14.9% |
| 30D | +36.6% | +21.7% | +14.8% | +40.8% |
| 3M | -8.9% | +22.8% | -31.6% | -5.5% |
| 6M | +311.9% | +8.2% | +303.7% | +323.0% |
| All | +311.9% | +6.5% | +305.4% | +323.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling