-39.6%
MULL vs NIO
-44.8%
+5.2%
-79.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +24.0% | -1.2% | +25.2% | +25.2% |
| 7D | -2.5% | -1.8% | -0.7% | +0.6% |
| 30D | -40.1% | -6.6% | -33.4% | -35.0% |
| 3M | -28.2% | -29.9% | +1.7% | +3.7% |
| 6M | -39.6% | -46.6% | +7.0% | +35.1% |
| All | -39.6% | -44.8% | +5.2% | +35.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling