+290.8%
MULL vs LNT
-2.7%
+293.5%
-68.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.0% | +0.9% | -4.0% | -1.4% |
| 7D | +14.0% | +1.0% | +13.0% | +16.0% |
| 30D | +24.8% | -1.1% | +25.9% | +21.9% |
| 3M | -16.1% | -3.6% | -12.5% | -17.6% |
| All | +290.8% | -2.7% | +293.5% | +294.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling