+276.7%
MULL vs EPAM
-16.7%
+293.4%
-68.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +11.8% | -2.4% | +14.2% | +8.8% |
| 7D | +17.3% | +2.0% | +15.4% | +20.2% |
| 30D | +23.5% | +6.5% | +17.0% | +32.1% |
| 3M | -24.0% | +19.9% | -43.9% | +28.5% |
| 6M | +276.7% | -16.9% | +293.7% | +364.1% |
| All | +276.7% | -16.7% | +293.4% | +364.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling