+2,302.1%
MULL vs BBIO
+176.9%
+2,125.2%
-72.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | BBIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -0.1% | -1.1% | -1.1% |
| 7D | -8.4% | -3.2% | -5.2% | -6.6% |
| 30D | +9.7% | -13.6% | +23.3% | +17.9% |
| 3M | -26.8% | +7.2% | -34.0% | -29.4% |
| 6M | +220.7% | +1.5% | +219.2% | +216.1% |
| YTD | +509.0% | -5.3% | +514.3% | +516.9% |
| 1Y | +1,739.5% | +37.7% | +1,701.8% | +1,400.5% |
| All | +2,302.1% | +176.9% | +2,125.2% | +1,282.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BBIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BBIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BBIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BBIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling