+276.7%
MULL vs ALHC
-27.0%
+303.8%
-68.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +11.8% | 0.0% | +11.8% | +11.8% |
| 7D | +17.3% | -0.6% | +17.9% | +17.3% |
| 30D | +23.5% | -1.0% | +24.5% | +23.5% |
| 3M | -24.0% | -10.2% | -13.8% | -13.7% |
| 6M | +276.7% | -28.3% | +305.0% | +289.5% |
| All | +276.7% | -27.0% | +303.8% | +289.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling