+9.6%
MUB vs ALHC
+22.7%
-13.0%
-6.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.4% | -1.9% | +1.5% | -0.3% |
| 7D | -1.3% | +0.3% | -1.5% | -1.3% |
| 30D | +2.2% | -10.6% | +12.7% | +2.2% |
| 3M | -1.6% | -45.3% | +43.7% | -1.4% |
| 6M | -1.3% | -59.7% | +58.4% | -0.9% |
| YTD | -0.7% | -62.7% | +62.1% | -0.3% |
| 1Y | -0.2% | -56.1% | +55.9% | +0.1% |
| 3Y | +9.6% | +21.3% | -11.6% | +8.2% |
| All | +9.6% | +22.7% | -13.0% | +8.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling