+228.8%
MU vs UMAC
+8.8%
+220.1%
-45.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.5% | -4.6% | +2.1% | -1.7% |
| 7D | +12.8% | -5.2% | +18.0% | +13.8% |
| 30D | -14.9% | -36.4% | +21.5% | -8.1% |
| 3M | -18.0% | -58.6% | +40.5% | -7.3% |
| 6M | -3.1% | -24.6% | +21.5% | -0.9% |
| YTD | +172.9% | -11.5% | +184.4% | +162.9% |
| 1Y | +228.8% | +16.9% | +212.0% | +192.5% |
| All | +228.8% | +8.8% | +220.1% | +192.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling