+153.8%
MU vs PCG
-24.3%
+178.1%
-39.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | PCG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.1% | +2.4% | +3.7% | +6.5% |
| 7D | +9.0% | -13.9% | +22.8% | +7.0% |
| 30D | +13.8% | -16.9% | +30.7% | +11.4% |
| 3M | +2.1% | -14.7% | +16.8% | +0.9% |
| 6M | +153.8% | -23.8% | +177.6% | +163.8% |
| All | +153.8% | -24.3% | +178.1% | +163.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PCG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PCG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PCG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PCG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling