+906.2%
MU vs ONDS
+862.9%
+43.2%
-57.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ONDS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.3% | +11.9% | -5.6% | +4.7% |
| 7D | -12.0% | +3.8% | -15.9% | -12.4% |
| 30D | -28.7% | -11.3% | -17.4% | -27.7% |
| 3M | -16.4% | -34.5% | +18.0% | -12.6% |
| 6M | -1.8% | -34.1% | +32.3% | +2.1% |
| YTD | +157.1% | -38.8% | +195.9% | +165.8% |
| 1Y | +208.5% | +2.8% | +205.7% | +201.1% |
| 3Y | +906.2% | +1,111.0% | -204.8% | +666.8% |
| All | +906.2% | +862.9% | +43.2% | +666.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ONDS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ONDS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ONDS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ONDS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling