+236.9%
MU vs LNG
+45.3%
+191.6%
-45.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +11.9% | +3.8% | +8.1% | +13.0% |
| 7D | +2.0% | +4.5% | -2.5% | +2.9% |
| 30D | -18.0% | +8.0% | -26.0% | -14.6% |
| 3M | -6.6% | +15.0% | -21.6% | +1.6% |
| 6M | +2.0% | +27.1% | -25.0% | +21.5% |
| YTD | +184.5% | +58.1% | +126.3% | +235.8% |
| 1Y | +236.9% | +45.0% | +191.9% | +292.1% |
| All | +236.9% | +45.3% | +191.6% | +292.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling