+966.8%
MU vs KRMN
+33.3%
+933.5%
-39.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.1% | -1.3% | +7.4% | +6.5% |
| 7D | +9.0% | -12.3% | +21.2% | +12.7% |
| 30D | +13.8% | -27.5% | +41.3% | +23.6% |
| 3M | +2.1% | -26.5% | +28.6% | +9.6% |
| 6M | +153.8% | -59.6% | +213.4% | +221.0% |
| YTD | +256.4% | -45.4% | +301.8% | +291.9% |
| 1Y | +719.8% | -25.1% | +744.9% | +692.3% |
| All | +966.8% | +33.3% | +933.5% | +624.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling