+153.8%
MU vs IONQ
+4.9%
+148.9%
-39.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | IONQ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.1% | +1.3% | +4.8% | +5.5% |
| 7D | +9.0% | +0.8% | +8.2% | +8.6% |
| 30D | +13.8% | -1.0% | +14.8% | +13.2% |
| 3M | +2.1% | -39.8% | +41.9% | +20.9% |
| 6M | +153.8% | +6.4% | +147.4% | +158.7% |
| All | +153.8% | +4.9% | +148.9% | +158.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside IONQ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus IONQ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × IONQ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded IONQ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling