+1,371.2%
MU vs HIMS
+308.1%
+1,063.1%
-57.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HIMS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.1% | -0.4% | +6.5% | +6.2% |
| 7D | +9.0% | -3.9% | +12.9% | +9.8% |
| 30D | +13.8% | -12.4% | +26.3% | +16.1% |
| 3M | +2.1% | -1.1% | +3.2% | +1.4% |
| 6M | +153.8% | +68.4% | +85.4% | +126.3% |
| YTD | +256.4% | -14.7% | +271.0% | +253.3% |
| 1Y | +719.8% | -42.4% | +762.2% | +756.8% |
| All | +1,371.2% | +308.1% | +1,063.1% | +950.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HIMS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HIMS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HIMS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HIMS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling