+1,362.4%
MU vs GLD
+126.8%
+1,235.6%
-57.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.1% | -0.8% | +6.9% | +6.6% |
| 7D | +9.0% | -0.5% | +9.5% | +9.3% |
| 30D | +13.8% | +4.4% | +9.4% | +10.8% |
| 3M | +2.1% | -1.1% | +3.2% | +2.3% |
| 6M | +153.8% | -13.8% | +167.6% | +168.1% |
| YTD | +256.4% | +2.6% | +253.8% | +255.6% |
| 1Y | +719.8% | +24.5% | +695.2% | +668.1% |
| All | +1,362.4% | +126.8% | +1,235.6% | +998.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling