+833.0%
MU vs FIG
-71.6%
+904.6%
-39.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FIG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.1% | -4.4% | +10.5% | +5.7% |
| 7D | +9.0% | -16.3% | +25.3% | +7.5% |
| 30D | +13.8% | -14.3% | +28.1% | +12.8% |
| 3M | +2.1% | +7.2% | -5.1% | +4.7% |
| 6M | +153.8% | -18.6% | +172.4% | +165.0% |
| YTD | +256.4% | -35.5% | +291.8% | +283.5% |
| 1Y | +719.8% | -55.8% | +775.6% | +804.1% |
| All | +833.0% | -71.6% | +904.6% | +890.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FIG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FIG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FIG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FIG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling