+808.8%
MU vs FGI
+2.3%
+806.5%
-57.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FGI | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -17.5% | 0.0% | -17.4% | -17.5% |
| 7D | -29.7% | -11.6% | -18.2% | -29.7% |
| 30D | -37.2% | -3.3% | -33.9% | -37.2% |
| 3M | -26.5% | +65.6% | -92.1% | -27.2% |
| 6M | +2.6% | -2.8% | +5.3% | +1.5% |
| YTD | +130.1% | +30.1% | +100.0% | +125.6% |
| 1Y | +176.7% | +50.2% | +126.5% | +173.0% |
| All | +808.8% | +2.3% | +806.5% | +841.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FGI.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FGI return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FGI return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FGI wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling