+1,371.2%
MU vs ENTG
+44.2%
+1,327.1%
-57.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENTG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.1% | +6.2% | -0.1% | +1.7% |
| 7D | +9.0% | +2.8% | +6.1% | +6.9% |
| 30D | +13.8% | -4.7% | +18.5% | +16.8% |
| 3M | +2.1% | -0.7% | +2.8% | +2.8% |
| 6M | +153.8% | +7.7% | +146.1% | +141.0% |
| YTD | +256.4% | +65.1% | +191.3% | +153.7% |
| 1Y | +719.8% | +74.8% | +645.0% | +451.4% |
| All | +1,371.2% | +44.2% | +1,327.1% | +1,078.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENTG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENTG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENTG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENTG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling