+808.8%
MU vs ENB
+68.0%
+740.8%
-57.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -17.5% | -1.4% | -16.1% | -17.6% |
| 7D | -29.7% | -2.4% | -27.4% | -29.9% |
| 30D | -37.2% | +3.4% | -40.6% | -36.9% |
| 3M | -26.5% | -6.1% | -20.4% | -26.6% |
| 6M | +2.6% | -10.0% | +12.6% | +1.7% |
| YTD | +130.1% | +4.7% | +125.5% | +122.9% |
| 1Y | +176.7% | +7.5% | +169.2% | +166.2% |
| All | +808.8% | +68.0% | +740.8% | +698.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling