+858.9%
MU vs CRCL
+47.9%
+811.0%
-39.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | CRCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.1% | -1.1% | +7.2% | +6.2% |
| 7D | +9.0% | +17.1% | -8.1% | +6.5% |
| 30D | +13.8% | +61.3% | -47.5% | +6.4% |
| 3M | +2.1% | +12.7% | -10.6% | -0.6% |
| 6M | +153.8% | -3.1% | +156.9% | +148.9% |
| YTD | +256.4% | +28.7% | +227.7% | +240.8% |
| 1Y | +719.8% | -13.1% | +732.9% | +696.7% |
| All | +858.9% | +47.9% | +811.0% | +834.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CRCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CRCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CRCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CRCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling