+2.1%
MU vs COST
-7.1%
+9.2%
-39.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | COST | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.1% | -1.0% | +7.1% | +3.5% |
| 7D | +9.0% | -3.1% | +12.1% | +1.0% |
| 30D | +13.8% | -2.8% | +16.6% | +7.1% |
| 3M | +2.1% | -5.7% | +7.8% | -10.1% |
| All | +2.1% | -7.1% | +9.2% | -10.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside COST.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus COST return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × COST return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded COST wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling