+1,362.4%
MU vs ASML
+164.3%
+1,198.1%
-57.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ASML | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.1% | +4.2% | +1.9% | +2.3% |
| 7D | +9.0% | +1.1% | +7.9% | +7.9% |
| 30D | +13.8% | +2.2% | +11.6% | +11.7% |
| 3M | +2.1% | -2.3% | +4.4% | +7.8% |
| 6M | +153.8% | +23.0% | +130.8% | +120.4% |
| YTD | +256.4% | +61.1% | +195.3% | +149.0% |
| 1Y | +719.8% | +129.1% | +590.6% | +335.8% |
| All | +1,362.4% | +164.3% | +1,198.1% | +645.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ASML.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ASML return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ASML return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ASML wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling