+148.1%
MTZ vs WAT
+46.1%
+102.0%
-50.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | WAT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.1% | -1.0% | +3.1% | +2.4% |
| 7D | -1.6% | -1.3% | -0.3% | -1.2% |
| 30D | -11.1% | +2.3% | -13.4% | -11.8% |
| 3M | -36.7% | +8.7% | -45.4% | -38.6% |
| 6M | -21.9% | +28.3% | -50.3% | -29.1% |
| YTD | +9.1% | +7.8% | +1.3% | +4.8% |
| 1Y | +30.0% | +36.6% | -6.6% | +12.8% |
| All | +148.1% | +46.1% | +102.0% | +83.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside WAT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus WAT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × WAT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded WAT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling