+37.5%
MTZ vs UMAC
+141.5%
-104.0%
-46.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.2% | -6.4% | +4.2% | -1.4% |
| 7D | +2.3% | +3.3% | -1.0% | +1.8% |
| 30D | -10.3% | -10.4% | +0.1% | -9.7% |
| 3M | -31.8% | +1.8% | -33.6% | -33.3% |
| 6M | -19.2% | +40.7% | -59.9% | -26.2% |
| YTD | +10.7% | +90.9% | -80.2% | -5.5% |
| 1Y | +37.5% | +151.8% | -114.2% | +16.0% |
| All | +37.5% | +141.5% | -104.0% | +16.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling