+226.9%
MTZ vs PLUG
-79.9%
+306.8%
-63.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PLUG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.2% | -7.5% | +2.4% | -4.3% |
| 7D | -10.6% | -4.9% | -5.7% | -10.2% |
| 30D | -30.4% | -27.4% | -3.0% | -27.9% |
| 3M | -40.4% | -35.7% | -4.7% | -37.5% |
| 6M | -63.7% | -59.3% | -4.3% | -60.3% |
| YTD | -26.9% | -31.5% | +4.6% | -25.0% |
| 1Y | -20.2% | -48.9% | +28.7% | -16.0% |
| All | +226.9% | -79.9% | +306.8% | +236.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLUG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLUG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLUG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLUG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling