+285.3%
MTZ vs PEGA
+41.6%
+243.7%
-63.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PEGA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | -0.4% | +5.1% | +4.7% |
| 7D | +12.9% | -8.6% | +21.5% | +14.0% |
| 30D | -8.5% | -10.1% | +1.5% | -7.6% |
| 3M | -30.6% | -4.7% | -25.9% | -30.6% |
| 6M | -55.1% | -8.0% | -47.1% | -55.2% |
| YTD | -13.0% | -47.1% | +34.2% | -3.3% |
| 1Y | -4.3% | -47.5% | +43.2% | +6.5% |
| All | +285.3% | +41.6% | +243.7% | +245.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PEGA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PEGA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PEGA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PEGA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling