-55.1%
MTZ vs NVS
+9.4%
-64.5%
-63.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NVS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | -1.8% | +6.4% | +4.0% |
| 7D | +12.9% | -2.8% | +15.7% | +11.8% |
| 30D | -8.5% | +11.5% | -20.0% | -5.6% |
| 3M | -30.6% | +3.7% | -34.3% | -29.3% |
| 6M | -55.1% | +10.4% | -65.5% | -55.8% |
| All | -55.1% | +9.4% | -64.5% | -55.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NVS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NVS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NVS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NVS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling