+156.5%
MTZ vs NTAP
+148.5%
+8.0%
-48.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NTAP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.1% | +0.1% | +2.0% | +2.1% |
| 7D | -1.6% | -0.8% | -0.8% | -1.3% |
| 30D | -11.1% | -0.5% | -10.5% | -11.1% |
| 3M | -36.7% | +4.1% | -40.8% | -38.3% |
| 6M | -21.9% | +88.0% | -109.9% | -45.8% |
| YTD | +9.1% | +75.6% | -66.5% | -22.0% |
| 1Y | +30.0% | +58.9% | -29.0% | -1.0% |
| All | +156.5% | +148.5% | +8.0% | +39.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTAP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTAP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTAP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTAP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling