-21.9%
MTZ vs NSC
+4.7%
-26.6%
-46.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NSC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.1% | +0.5% | +1.6% | +2.1% |
| 7D | -1.6% | -5.5% | +3.9% | -1.0% |
| 30D | -11.1% | -3.2% | -7.9% | -10.9% |
| 3M | -36.7% | +7.7% | -44.4% | -38.6% |
| 6M | -21.9% | +4.5% | -26.5% | -21.0% |
| All | -21.9% | +4.7% | -26.6% | -21.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NSC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NSC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NSC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NSC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling