+157.9%
MTZ vs NOC
+53.6%
+104.3%
-61.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | NOC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.1% | -2.5% | +4.6% | +2.2% |
| 7D | -1.6% | -5.2% | +3.6% | -1.4% |
| 30D | -11.1% | -7.2% | -3.9% | -10.9% |
| 3M | -36.7% | -5.1% | -31.6% | -36.6% |
| 6M | -21.9% | -31.1% | +9.1% | -19.9% |
| YTD | +9.1% | -8.6% | +17.7% | +9.7% |
| 1Y | +30.0% | -9.7% | +39.7% | +30.8% |
| 3Y | +138.5% | +24.3% | +114.2% | +133.2% |
| All | +157.9% | +53.6% | +104.3% | +129.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NOC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NOC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NOC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NOC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling