+157.9%
MTZ vs NIO
-90.7%
+248.6%
-61.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.1% | -1.6% | +3.7% | +2.3% |
| 7D | -1.6% | -13.0% | +11.5% | +0.5% |
| 30D | -11.1% | -18.3% | +7.2% | -8.4% |
| 3M | -36.7% | -33.2% | -3.5% | -32.8% |
| 6M | -21.9% | -21.5% | -0.5% | -19.9% |
| YTD | +9.1% | -25.5% | +34.6% | +12.6% |
| 1Y | +30.0% | -38.0% | +68.0% | +36.8% |
| 3Y | +138.5% | -65.5% | +203.9% | +160.3% |
| All | +157.9% | -90.7% | +248.6% | +229.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling