-21.9%
MTZ vs MULL
+290.4%
-312.3%
-46.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | MULL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.1% | +11.8% | -9.7% | -0.1% |
| 7D | -1.6% | +17.3% | -18.9% | -4.7% |
| 30D | -11.1% | +23.5% | -34.6% | -15.0% |
| 3M | -36.7% | -24.0% | -12.7% | -38.0% |
| 6M | -21.9% | +276.7% | -298.7% | -41.2% |
| All | -21.9% | +290.4% | -312.3% | -41.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MULL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MULL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MULL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MULL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling