-63.7%
MTZ vs LII
-32.0%
-31.7%
-63.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | LII | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.2% | -2.8% | -2.3% | -4.7% |
| 7D | -10.6% | +0.2% | -10.8% | -10.7% |
| 30D | -30.4% | -4.6% | -25.8% | -30.0% |
| 3M | -40.4% | -21.7% | -18.8% | -36.3% |
| 6M | -63.7% | -32.8% | -30.9% | -59.5% |
| All | -63.7% | -32.0% | -31.7% | -59.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LII.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LII return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LII return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LII wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling