+14.6%
MTZ vs GLXY
-40.0%
+54.6%
-63.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLXY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.3% | -2.8% | -1.6% | -3.7% |
| 7D | -8.7% | -16.2% | +7.4% | -4.9% |
| 30D | -15.0% | -30.6% | +15.6% | -9.0% |
| 3M | -32.6% | -27.7% | -4.9% | -28.8% |
| 6M | -56.3% | -53.3% | -3.0% | -50.9% |
| YTD | -16.8% | -36.9% | +20.1% | -12.1% |
| 1Y | -10.0% | -55.6% | +45.6% | -1.1% |
| All | +14.6% | -40.0% | +54.6% | +26.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLXY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLXY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLXY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLXY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling