+226.9%
MTZ vs GD
+55.3%
+171.6%
-63.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.2% | -2.3% | -2.8% | -4.1% |
| 7D | -10.6% | -3.9% | -6.7% | -8.8% |
| 30D | -30.4% | +8.1% | -38.5% | -32.5% |
| 3M | -40.4% | -6.8% | -33.6% | -38.4% |
| 6M | -63.7% | +3.0% | -66.7% | -64.2% |
| YTD | -26.9% | +7.8% | -34.6% | -30.0% |
| 1Y | -20.2% | +5.8% | -26.0% | -22.7% |
| All | +226.9% | +55.3% | +171.6% | +146.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling